Skip to content
APPLICATION ANSWERS · L-1A FIELD GUIDE

Should we pay a records provider to recreate documents it cannot locate for a Cape Breton Regional Municipality applicant?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

Paying for legitimate retrieval, certified copies or an accurate explanation can be appropriate, but fictional reconstruction or backdating is not a solution. Clarify what the provider can actually produce and what fact it would establish. Review other reliable evidence with the immigration adviser.

Specify the deliverable

Distinguish a copy of an existing record from a new statement based on available information. Confirm cost and expected timing before commissioning work. A large archive fee does not guarantee that the resulting material proves the qualifying relationship or duties.

The petitioning employer, not the transferee, carries the cost of the petition, and the budget divides into charges nobody can negotiate and charges that are entirely a matter of choice.

The fixed side is government fees: the Form I-129 filing fee, the asylum programme fee and the fraud prevention and detection fee where they apply, and premium processing if the company elects it. Verify each against the current USCIS fee schedule, Form G-1055, before it enters a plan; quoting an amount remembered from a previous transfer is how these budgets go wrong.

The variable side is evidence and advice. Retrieving corporate records, obtaining certified copies from a registrar, translating foreign-language documents, reconstructing payroll history for the qualifying year abroad — each is priced by the hour or by the document, and each is worth scoping before it is commissioned. Ask the provider what the deliverable will be and which fact it would establish. A search that returns a certified share register answers the qualifying-relationship question; an expensive search that returns nothing answers none of them.

What money cannot buy is any of the four elements: the relationship between the entities, one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad inside the previous three years, duties that are primarily managerial or executive, and time remaining under the seven-year cap.

Hypothetical example: a bakery systems manager’s former payroll bureau charges per year of records restored. Restoring only the twelve months that establish the qualifying year — and dating that request from the intended filing — keeps the spend proportionate to the fact it proves.